ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2026
C2 Hangman's fracture treated with posterior cervical fixation with preservation of the semispinalis cervicis muscle: a case report.
Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction and importance: Although posterior fixation is well established for unstable Hangman's fractures, constructs including C1 often sacrifice cervical rotation, and conventional exposure frequently injures the semispinalis cervicis (SSC). Given the SSC's essential role in cervical stability, techniques that preserve this muscle may substantially improve postoperative function. However, its preservation during C1-3 fixation has been rarely documented in the literature. Case presentation: A 30-year-old woman sustained a Levine-Edwards type I Hangman's fracture from a rollover motor-vehicle accident. Conservative management failed, and CT revealed persistent non-union with an 8-mm fracture gap. Posterior C1-3 fixation with deliberate SSC preservation was performed. The SSC was mobilized laterally without detachment from the C2 spinous process, enabling adequate exposure for screw placement with intraoperative 3D navigation. Postoperative imaging confirmed complete SSC preservation. One year later, after solid bony healing, implant removal was performed. The preserved SSC displayed minimal adhesions, and screw removal proceeded uneventfully. Following removal, the patient experienced significant improvement in cervical rotation and remained asymptomatic. Clinical discussion: This case demonstrates that SSC preservation is feasible, reproducible, and may meaningfully influence postoperative biomechanics. By minimizing paraspinal muscle damage, this technique may reduce axial symptoms and optimize motion recovery - limitations commonly associated with conventional posterior approaches. Conclusion: SSC-preserving posterior C1-3 fixation may represent a valuable modification for managing selected Hangman's fractures, offering potential functional advantages beyond standard techniques. Broader application and long-term evaluation are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.