ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2026
Anesthetic adaptations for robotic-assisted pediatric surgery in a resource-constrained setting: a case report.
Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Robotic-assisted pediatric surgery enhances visualization and dexterity but poses anesthetic challenges in low-resource settings. These challenges are compounded by prolonged operative times, pneumoperitoneum, and restricted patient access. This report describes the first pediatric robotic-assisted choledochal cyst excision performed at a Philippine tertiary hospital, highlighting anesthetic considerations and adaptive strategies in a resource-constrained environment. Presentation of the Case: A female child with a 2-year history of intermittent epigastric pain and no comorbidities was diagnosed with a choledochal cyst and scheduled for elective robotic-assisted excision. General anesthesia was supplemented by redundant monitors and intravenous accesses, an extended precordial stethoscope, improvised padding, cling-wrap insulation, and microwave-warmed intravenous fluids. Atracurium infusion ensured deep paralysis, while ventilatory adjustments countered the effects of pneumoperitoneum. The surgery was uneventful. Discussion: Anesthesia was complicated by altered respiratory and hemodynamic physiology, the risk of hypothermia, the need for paralysis, and limited access after docking. Careful preoperative assessment, vigilant monitoring, redundancy, and evidence-supported improvisation mitigated these risks. This case illustrates the disparity between advanced surgical technology and limited anesthetic infrastructure in developing countries. Conclusion: This case highlights the conditional feasibility of pediatric robotic-assisted surgery in a resource-limited setting when performed on a carefully selected patient. Safety under such constraints depends on meticulous preparation, anticipation of physiologic challenges, monitoring redundancy, and adaptive anesthetic strategies. As robotic surgical platforms become increasingly adopted in developing countries, strengthening perioperative infrastructure and support systems remains essential to ensure patient safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.