ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2026
Nasopharyngeal live leech infestation: an unusual cause of posterior bloody nasal discharge: two case reports.
Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction and importance: Leech infestation is a rare but important cause of epistaxis and bloody posterior nasal discharge, particularly in individuals exposed to non-potable or infested water sources. Prompt diagnosis and removal are essential to prevent complications. Case presentation: We present two cases of nasopharyngeal leech infestation from endemic regions of eastern Iran. The first case involved a 42-year-old man from Khaaf, Razavi Khorasan Province, with intermittent epistaxis and bloody nasal discharge following river swimming. The second case involved a 35-year-old man with intellectual disability from Torbat-e Jam, Razavi Khorasan Province, who developed throat discomfort and bloody discharge after drinking non-potable water. In both cases, nasopharyngoscopy revealed a live leech attached to the mucosa and extending into the oropharynx. The leeches were successfully removed using Luc's forceps under endoscopic visualization without anesthesia. Both patients underwent complete head, neck, and airway examinations, including fibrolaryngoscopy, confirming no additional infestations. They were prescribed oral ciprofloxacin and remained asymptomatic at follow-up. Discussion: Leech infestation, though uncommon, should be considered in patients presenting with unexplained epistaxis, particularly those with a history of water exposure in endemic regions. Aquatic leeches secrete anticoagulants that cause persistent bleeding. Diagnosis requires careful nasopharyngoscopic evaluation. Endoscopic-guided removal is safe and effective in an outpatient setting. Prophylactic antibiotics, especially those covering Conclusion: Leech infestation should be included in the differential diagnosis of unexplained posterior epistaxis, particularly in endemic or low-sanitation areas. Early recognition and careful removal can prevent complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.