Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42578234›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2026

Ballistic head and neck injuries: management rationale and outcomes in a case series.

Ahmad Alkheder, Adel Azar, Ahmad Mustafa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ahmad AlkhederDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Al Mouwasat University Hospital, Damascus University, Damascus, Syria.
Adel AzarDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Al Mouwasat University Hospital, Damascus University, Damascus, Syria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-7260-5613
Ahmad MustafaDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Al Mouwasat University Hospital, Damascus University, Damascus, Syria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Penetrating head and neck injuries with retained foreign bodies pose significant management challenges due to the anatomical density of vital structures. The optimal therapeutic strategy - ranging from surgical extraction to conservative observation - remains guided by individual patient and injury characteristics. Methods: This case series retrospectively reviews four distinct presentations of retained metallic foreign bodies in the head and neck region. Diagnostic evaluation utilized advanced computed tomography (CT) for precise localization. Management strategies were individualized, including functional endoscopic sinus surgery, open surgical exploration via parotid and cervical approaches, and active observation. Results: CT imaging was critical for preoperative planning in all symptomatic cases, accurately defining the relationship of fragments to neurovascular structures. Endoscopic retrieval was successful for a fragment within an Onodi cell. Open approaches were required for fragments embedded in the parotid region and deep neck, with one patient developing Frey syndrome postoperatively. In an asymptomatic patient with no structural compromise, observation was safely elected. Delayed complications, including chronic pain and infection, manifested years after the initial injury in two cases. Conclusions: Management of penetrating head and neck foreign bodies requires a tailored, multidisciplinary approach. Advanced imaging is indispensable for risk assessment and planning. Treatment should be individualized, with minimally invasive techniques preferred when feasible, while observation is a valid option in select asymptomatic patients. Long-term follow-up is essential due to the potential for delayed sequelae.

Indexed as

case serieshead and neckmanagementobservationpenetrating injuriessurgery

Identifiers

PMID42578234
PMCPMC13456815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.