ArticleRheumatology advances in practice2026
Perspectives of sedentary behaviour, physical activity and health messaging among people with fibromyalgia: a qualitative study.
Article in Rheumatology advances in practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To explore how individuals with fibromyalgia (FM) perceive physical activity (PA), sedentary behaviour (SB) and related health messaging. Methods: UK-based adults (18+) with FM were recruited using maximum variation sampling from charities, social media support groups and research contacts. A constructivist qualitative approach was adopted, recognizing that experiences and meanings are constructed through social context and interpretation. Semi-structured interviews were conducted virtually, informed by a behavioural model of Capability, Opportunity and Motivation (COM-B) and the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). A patient and public involvement (PPI) contributor informed the development of the interview guide. Data were analysed using a reflexive thematic analysis to explore how participants interpreted SB, PA and health messaging. Results: Fifteen participants (13 female, 2 male) aged 21-73 years (mean = 50.87, SD = 15.47) described complex, often conflicting experiences of PA and SB. Emotional responses like guilt, fear, and frustration influenced engagement with PA. Rest and activity were viewed as beneficial; however, balancing movement and rest was an ongoing challenge, influenced by fluctuating symptoms and external expectations. Participants highlighted a disconnect between clinical advice and lived experience, with terms like 'sedentary' often perceived as unrelatable or stigmatizing. Socioeconomic factors, including limited access to personalized support and social rules, impacted engagement and contributed to feelings of stigma. Conclusion: Participants reported emotional and practical challenges in balancing PA and SB, influenced by fluctuating symptoms, expectations and limited or unrelatable clinical advice. These findings highlight the need for personalized, inclusive, and context-sensitive movement advice that reflects lived experience to improve relevance and uptake.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.