ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2026
Atypical glomus tumors of the lower extremity: a case report of two patients.
Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction and importance: Glomus tumors are rare but clinically significant neoplasms characterized by severe focal pain and a broad anatomic distribution extending well beyond the digits. Extradigital glomus tumors are rare and can lead to prolonged pain and treatment delays; hence, the aim of this study. Case presentation: Patient A, a 51-year-old male, experienced 12 years of refractory anterior right hip pain. MRI revealed an intermediate signal intensity lesion near the intertrochanteric region. Patient B, a 48-year-old male, had 5 years of knee pain with quadriceps atrophy secondary to an adductor canal lesion on MRI. Histopathology revealed uniform, small, round-to-oval cells with a cookie-cutter appearance and pale eosinophilic cytoplasm, which were highly vascular and stained positive for smooth muscle actin. Treatment involved marginal surgical excision, with no signs of recurrence on prolonged follow-up. Clinical discussion: Diagnosis relies on clinical awareness and suspicion, especially in non-resolving and atypical causes of pain and functional limitation, in combination with targeted imaging and confirmatory histopathology. The immunophenotype is crucial in distinguishing a glomus tumor from numerous mimickers. Surgical excision remains curative in most cases, although recurrence can occur when resection is incomplete. Awareness of atypical variants and malignant glomus tumors is essential to ensure proper and timely management. Conclusion: Extradigital, deep-seated glomus tumors are atypical, leading to prolonged diagnostic delays. The diagnostic challenges of extradigital glomus tumors underscore the need for clinical vigilance and timely surgical management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.