ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2026
Laparoscopic resection of a primary retroperitoneal mucinous cystadenoma: a case report.
Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Primary retroperitoneal mucinous cystadenoma (PRMC) is a rare tumor of uncertain origin, predominantly affecting women. Most cases are asymptomatic or present with nonspecific symptoms, making diagnosis challenging due to its retroperitoneal location and lack of distinct clinical signs. Case presentation: A 47-year-old woman presented with progressive abdominal distension, altered bowel habits, and flatulence. A 12-cm palpable mass was detected in the right flank. Abdominal computed tomography demonstrated a well-defined cystic lesion adjacent to the ascending colon. The patient was evaluated and treated at a tertiary care academic hospital. Elective laparoscopic excision was performed using indocyanine green for real-time intraoperative ureteral visualization. The procedure was completed without complications. Histopathological analysis confirmed PRMC, with mucinous epithelium lacking atypia and no evidence of malignancy. Discussion: Although PRMC shares features with ovarian mucinous tumors, it arises independently in the retroperitoneum and is often difficult to diagnose preoperatively due to the absence of specific clinical or radiological signs. Imaging studies can help delineate the lesion, but definitive diagnosis depends on histopathological confirmation. Complete surgical excision without rupture is essential to avoid recurrence or potential malignant transformation. Minimally invasive resection, when feasible, offers a safe and effective therapeutic option with low morbidity. Conclusion: PRMC should be considered in the differential diagnosis of retroperitoneal cystic lesions in women. Laparoscopic excision was safe and effective in this case. A long-term follow-up is recommended due to the risk of recurrence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.