ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2026
Intravesical migration of an intrauterine contraceptive device complicated by giant bladder calculus formation: a case report.
Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction and importance: An intrauterine device (IUD) perforating the uterus and migrating into the bladder to become a nidus for stone formation is an uncommon scenario with a considerable management challenge. Case presentation: A 28-year-old woman presented with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) along with pelvic pain of 3 years' duration after 7 years of IUD insertion. A computed tomography scan and cystoscopy confirmed the presence of an IUD with a large stone formation inside the bladder. The stone was successfully fragmented using a pneumatic lithotripter, and the IUD, along with the stone fragments, was extracted without complications using a nephroscope. Clinical discussion: IUD migration into adjacent structures is a rare entity, occurring in one to two cases per 1000 insertions. The urinary bladder represents the second most common site of IUD migration, following the intestine. Affected patients often present with non-specific LUTS and usually report treatment for recurrent urinary tract infections, which causes a diagnostic delay, ultimately leading to calculus formation. Conclusion: Endoscopic management of an intravesically migrated IUD associated with calculus formation is the preferred therapeutic approach, offering favorable outcomes with reduced morbidity compared to more invasive interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.