ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2026
Huge retroperitoneal leiomyoma: a case report of a massive 35 cm tumor presenting with vague abdominal pain.
Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction and importance: Leiomyoma is the most common benign tumor in females, typically occurring in the uterus. Primary retroperitoneal leiomyoma (PRL) is an exceptionally rare variant that originates from local smooth muscle tissue outside the female reproductive tract. Due to its rarity, it often presents a diagnostic challenge, mimicking more aggressive retroperitoneal malignancies. Case presentation: A 45-year-old woman presented with a 1-year history of nonspecific abdominal pain. CT imaging identified a massive unilocular mass in the right retroperitoneal space. Surgical exploration was performed to resect the giant tumor. Histopathology confirmed the diagnosis of leiomyoma. The patient's postoperative course was unremarkable, and she was discharged in good clinical status. Clinical discussion: PRLs are often asymptomatic until they reach a significant size, leading to late discovery. Radiologically, they can be difficult to distinguish from leiomyosarcomas. Surgical excision is the primary treatment and is necessary for a definitive diagnosis. While these tumors are histologically benign, their location makes complete resection vital to prevent local recurrence and alleviate pressure on adjacent structures. Conclusion: PRL is a rare but important differential diagnosis for retroperitoneal masses. Despite their benign nature, these cases require precise surgical management and close long-term follow-up due to the potential risk of malignant transformation or recurrence. This case adds to the limited literature on giant primary retroperitoneal tumors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.