ArticleAnnals of maxillofacial surgery
Biomechanical Integrity Following Hemimandibulectomy With Free Fibular Flap Reconstruction Under External Impact Loading - An
Article in Annals of maxillofacial surgery. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Hemimandibulectomy for aggressive mandibular pathology results in significant functional and structural loss, necessitating reconstruction. The fibular free flap, although the gold standard, introduces biomechanical disparities that may alter the mandible's response to traumatic forces. While previous studies have focused on masticatory stress, the impact of high-energy trauma remains underexplored. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the biomechanical response of normal and fibula-reconstructed mandibles to external impact forces using finite element analysis (FEA), focusing on stress distribution and fracture-prone regions. Materials and Methods: Computed tomography-derived three-dimensional models of a normal mandible and a fibula-reconstructed mandible post-hemimandibulectomy were developed. Standardised impact loads of 2000 N were applied at the symphysis and mandibular body. Material properties were assumed to be linearly elastic and isotropic, and von Mises stress (VMS) analysis was performed to evaluate load response patterns. Results: The normal mandible demonstrated symmetrical stress distribution, with peak values at the bilateral condyles and predictable contralateral transfer under lateral loading. In contrast, the reconstructed mandible exhibited elevated and asymmetrical stress, particularly at the condylar necks, graft-host interfaces and fixation zones, indicating increased susceptibility to mechanical failure, especially under lateral loading. Discussion: Fibula-reconstructed hemimandibles show distinct biomechanical vulnerabilities under high-impact loading, particularly at the graft-host interface and condyles. These findings highlight the need for reinforcement strategies, optimised fixation planning and patient counselling regarding trauma risk. Strategic reinforcement at the graft-host junction and consideration of condylar load redistribution may help reduce fracture risk under traumatic conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.