ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2026
Successful resection of a giant pericardial myolipoma in a resource-limited setting: a case report.
Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Primary pericardial tumors are exceedingly rare. To date, there have been no reports of myolipoma occurring in the pericardial cavity. A dumbbell-shaped myolipoma with intrapericardial extension and a narrow pedicle traversing the pericardial sac is exceptionally rare. Surgical excision of such a large mass is particularly uncommon in resource-limited settings. Here, we report a case of the successful resection of a giant pericardial myolipoma in a 50-year-old female patient managed in a low-resource environment. Case summary: A 50-year-old female with a history of hypertension presented with progressive shortness of breath. Laboratory investigations were unremarkable, and cross-sectional imaging revealed a large fat-containing anterior mediastinal mass. The patient underwent surgery through a median sternotomy, which revealed two large lipomatous masses connected by a narrow pedicle traversing the pericardial sac, producing a dumbbell-shaped configuration. Both masses were successfully excised. Histopathology confirmed the diagnosis of myolipoma. The patient had an uneventful recovery and was discharged on postoperative day 14. Discussion: Primary pericardial myolipomas are rare, and most patients are asymptomatic. When symptomatic, compressive features predominate. Echocardiography serves as an initial screening tool, but contrast-enhanced cross-sectional imaging remains the cornerstone for diagnosis, surgical planning, and evaluation of tumor extent. Excision of large intrapericardial tumors requires a multidisciplinary approach to achieve optimal outcomes. Conclusion: This case highlights the rarity of giant pericardial myolipomas and demonstrates that successful surgical excision is feasible, even in resource-limited settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.