ArticleAnnals of maxillofacial surgery
Post-operative Sequelae Following Surgical Removal of Mandibular Third Molars with and Without the Use of a Tube Drain - A Comparative Study.
Article in Annals of maxillofacial surgery. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The most commonly performed oral surgical procedure involves the surgical extraction of an impacted mandibular third molar. Subsequently, documented evidence indicates the presence of associated sequelae, including diminished mouth opening, swelling and postoperative discomfort. This study aimed to objectively assess the levels of pain, swelling and trismus following surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars, comparing cases with and without the use of an intraoral tube drain. Materials and Methods: Fifty patients with bilateral impacted mandibular third molars in both sides of the jaw were enrolled in this study. A modified infant feeding tube was inserted, measuring 2-3 cm in length, with custom slots into the experimental side. Patients were scheduled for follow-up 2 days, 4 days and 8 days after surgery to assess pain, facial swelling and trismus. The drain was removed during the first follow-up visit, and sutures were removed 8 days after surgery. Results: Our study findings clearly highlight the advantages of utilising a tube drain following the extraction of an impacted mandibular third molar, particularly in reducing post-operative facial swelling and trismus. Data reveal a notable decrease in postoperative pain when a tube drain is employed compared to the group that did not use tube drains post-extraction. Discussion: Use of drainage tubes has been shown to enhance postoperative pain relief, reduce facial swelling and alleviate trismus immediately after surgery. Moreover, surgical drains have demonstrated excellent patient compliance and safety, underscoring their importance in standard treatment protocol for patients undergoing surgical extraction of impacted mandibular third molars.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.