ArticleAnnals of maxillofacial surgery
Feracrylum Pressure Pack Versus Conventional Pressure Pack in Achieving Post-extraction Haemostasis in 4-12-year-old Children - A Comparative Study.
Article in Annals of maxillofacial surgery. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Achieving effective haemostasis following dental extractions in children is vital to prevent post-operative complications. Although conventional pressure packs (CPPs) are routinely used, feracrylum, a topical haemostatic agent with antimicrobial and hygroscopic properties, may offer superior clinical outcomes. Materials and Methods: A total of 187 healthy children aged 4-12 years requiring routine dental extractions were included, with 92 participants allocated to the feracrylum pressure pack (FPP) group and 95 to the CPP group. Post-operative bleeding was assessed using the Rai and Ratan haemostasis scale at predefined time intervals. Statistical analysis was performed using the Chi-square test, Student Results: At T Discussion: FPP was significantly more effective than CPP in achieving post-extraction haemostasis in children and may be considered a reliable option in paediatric dental practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.