ArticleCureus2026
The Impact of Creative Writing on Patients With Chronic Pain.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims and objectives Creative writing has already been utilized within the context of care and rehabilitation of patients suffering from various mental and physical conditions, yielding positive outcomes. The aim of this study is to examine whether and how the psychosomatic state of chronic pain patients is affected by their engagement with creative writing. Methodological design The study employed a non-randomized design and used a longitudinal controlled quasi-experimental design with two parallel groups assessed at three timepoints: pre-intervention (T1), mid-intervention (T2), and post-intervention (T3). Ethical issues and approval Participants provided written informed consent, and the study was approved by the Scientific Council of the University General Hospital of Alexandroupolis (approval number: 50535/18-10-2023). Research methods and interventions This controlled longitudinal quasi-experimental study included 120 adults with chronic pain, allocated to an intervention group (n = 60) or a control group (n = 60), and compared the effects of a creative writing intervention against a waitlist control on self-assessed pain severity, quality of life, anxiety, and self-rated health, assessed at three timepoints (T1 = baseline; T2 = mid-point; T3 = post-intervention). Results Over an observation period of two weeks, the control group showed near-zero change on every outcome: pain, anxiety, functional impairment, and health. The intervention group, by contrast, showed a progressive improvement in self-rated health and a meaningful decrease in anxiety, while pain severity and functional impairment remained broadly stable. Conclusions The intervention was associated with significant reductions in anxiety and depression and meaningful improvements in self-rated health by the end of the observation period. Pain severity itself did not change significantly at the group level, but the way pain related to other aspects of quality of life differed markedly between the two groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.