ArticleShinrigaku kenkyu : The Japanese journal of psychology2026
[Why do people feel anxious and worried? Development of the Japanese version of the Contrast Avoidance Questionnaire].
Article in Shinrigaku kenkyu : The Japanese journal of psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Validation of the Chinese version of the Contrast Avoidance Questionnaires.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The contrast avoidance model has been proposed as a (maladaptive) emotion regulation strategy in generalized anxiety disorder, suggesting that chronic worry and anxiety play a role in maintaining a negative mood to prevent a drastic shift to negative emotions triggered by uncertain future events. This model ironically explains why individuals with generalized anxiety disorder experience persistent worry and anxiety. The Contrast Avoidance Questionnaire (CAQ) was originally developed in English to assess individual differences in contrast avoidance. In this study, we developed a Japanese version of the CAQ and tested its reliability and validity. The CAQ includes two versions: one focusing on worry (CAQ-W) and the other on negative mood (CAQ-GE). Study 1 confirmed the structural validity and internal consistency of the Japanese version of the scale. Study 2 demonstrated sufficient test-retest reliability. Study 3 examined convergent and divergent validity, and the results generally replicated the original findings. We discussed transdiagnostic clinical applications and outlined directions for future research using the CAQ.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.