ArticleThe journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG2026
Suitability of Oral Formulations Available to Children at the Time of Pediatric Labeling.
Article in The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe pediatric drug development landscape has experienced major shifts, largely in response to legislative and regulatory initiatives. However, associated laws and guidance documents fail to mandate the manufacture of pediatric formulations for commercial marketing post-regulatory approval. This study explores the nature of commercial products available at the time of pediatric labeling.
methodsAll orally administered drugs for which labeling changes were made from 1998-2024 were evaluated. Characteristics of each drug's commercially marketed formulation(s) at the time of labeling were identified using product labeling (Drugs@FDA), Drugs.com, and DailyMed.
resultsDuring the timeframe reviewed, there were 611 unique labeling changes representing 425 unique drugs available as 567 commercially marketed formulations. Of these drugs, 188 were marketed with pediatric-friendly (PF) formulations. The remainder were available only as solid oral dosage forms. For 329 pediatric labeling changes (53.8%), the only commercially marketed formulation was a solid oral dosage form, in many cases at sizes exceeding reasonable thresholds for the age group. For the remaining 282 labeling changes, a PF formulation was available alone or as a companion to the adult formulation. Among the PF formulations, 62% were suited to direct administration (liquid, orodispersible tablet, chewable/paste, transmucosal) while the remainder required manipulation (i.e. powder/granule, sprinkle/pellet, dispersible tablet). Three-fourths of the PF formulations incorporated flavorings and aromas though 13% failed to report the use of sweeteners.
conclusionsLess than complete access to PF formulations requires attention if we are to maximize the provision of suitable pharmacotherapy for pediatric patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.