ReviewThe Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale2026
Molecular Diagnosis of Bacterial Meningitis in Ethiopia: A Narrative Review of Current Evidence and Implementation Gaps.
Review in The Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Molecular Diagnosis of Bacterial Meningitis in Ethiopia: A Narrative Review of Current Evidence and Implementation Gaps.The Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Bacterial meningitis (BM) remains a significant public health concern in Ethiopia, particularly due to diagnostic challenges posed by limited laboratory infrastructure, late patient presentation, and technical skills required for cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) sampling. Molecular diagnostic methods offer rapid, sensitive, and specific alternatives to conventional culture. Objective: This narrative review synthesizes available evidence on molecular diagnostics for BM in Ethiopia, evaluates their performance compared to conventional methods, and identifies barriers to implementation. Methods: A structured literature search was conducted in PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science (August 1977-September 2024) using the terms: Meningitis OR Bacterial meningitis AND Diagnostics OR Molecular diagnostics, including PCR, CRISPR, next-generation sequencing (NGS), and MALDI-TOF. The review used a repeatable research selection procedure, well-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria, and PRISMA reporting requirements. Studies from Ethiopia and other low-resource settings were included. After screening titles/abstracts and full texts, 66 articles were selected. Results: In Ethiopia, multiplex PCR detected bacterial DNA in 10%-22% of the CSF samples, whereas culture was positive in only 0.5%-1% of the cases, primarily due to pre-admission antibiotic use. Globally, molecular panels (e.g., BioFire FilmArray ME) show > 90% sensitivity and specificity. Advanced techniques (CRISPR-Cas, NGS, and MALDI-TOF) have not yet been implemented in Ethiopian routine diagnostics. Conclusion: Molecular methods vastly improve the detection of BM in Ethiopia, but high costs, infrastructure gaps, and shortage of trained personnel prevent widespread adoption. Molecular assays have outstanding analytical sensitivity, but culture remains the gold standard for confirmation of the viability of live pathogens. Implementation gaps require urgent targeted investment in point-of-care diagnostics and specialized transport networks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.