ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Estimating indicator weights for the motor health of pre-school-aged children: an integrated-methods approach.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Motor health and long-term development of pre-school children is a pressing issue that requires urgent attention. While motor health is critically important for the early growth stage of pre-school children, establishing a multi-dimensional health evaluation indicator weighting system using an integrated subjective-objective weighting method remains a cutting-edge challenge in current research. Methods: WPS Office 6.4 and IBM Results: The total combined weight of the six primary indicators is 1.0, with individual weights ranging from 0.109 to 0.213. The corresponding weights of the 26 secondary indicators range from 0.014 to 0.215. Regarding the weighting of first-level indicators, no significant correlation was found between the comprehensive weighting method and the Delphi method ( Conclusion: By adopting an integrated subjective-objective weighting method, this study establishes evaluation indicator weights based on two foundations: the intrinsic patterns within the data and expert experience. The weights derived through this dual-foundation approach therefore exhibit improved rationality and credibility, providing important reference value for the comprehensive assessment of pre-school children's motor health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.