ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)
A robust and reproducible automated MRI pipeline for quantifying tissue outcomes after experimental stroke in multi-center preclinical networks.
Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The failure to translate promising preclinical stroke therapies into clinical success is a multi-faceted problem; however, a critical contributing factor is the lack of rigorous, reproducible preclinical outcome measures. While magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) offers a translational alternative to traditional histology, its use in large, multi-site trials is challenged by data heterogeneity and the need for scalable analysis. To address this, we developed and validated a fully automated, open-source image analysis pipeline for the Stroke Preclinical Assessment Network (SPAN), a six-center preclinical trial network. The pipeline processed T2-weighted and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps from over 2,000 mice and rats, incorporating steps for cross-site data harmonization, deep learning-based brain extraction, and rule-based segmentation to quantify infarct volume, brain swelling, and atrophy. The pipeline demonstrated high accuracy, as automated lesion volumes strongly correlated with manual expert tracing on both MRI (R = 0.96) and 2,3,5-triphenyl-tetrazolium chloride (TTC)-stained tissue (R = 0.86). The U-net model for brain extraction achieved a Dice score of 0.96, and our harmonization method successfully reduced inter-site variability in quantitative MRI parameters. This robust and reproducible pipeline provides a scalable framework for standardizing tissue outcome assessment, enhancing the rigor of multi-site preclinical studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.