ArticleCrohn's & colitis 3602026
Evaluating the access process for patients transitioning from intravenous to subcutaneous biologic administration for inflammatory bowel disease.
Article in Crohn's & colitis 360, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Research is needed to evaluate challenges associated with payers' and patients' uptake of vedolizumab and infliximab subcutaneous (SC) formulations, which were recently approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Methods: A single center, ambispective study evaluated patients with inflammatory bowel disease with a referral to start or transition to SC vedolizumab or infliximab between September 2023 and December 2024. The primary outcome was time to SC formulation access. Secondary outcomes included whether patients were approved for SC therapy, method of approval, and number of patients not starting SC maintenance therapy after referral. Results: Of the 248 patients included in the regression analyses, most patients (72%) referred to SC were approved, with over half of those approvals occurring via prior authorization (56%). Of the 179 patients approved to start therapy, 21% of patients did not start therapy, largely due to patient decision (45%). The median time to access was 11 days (interquartile range 1-43) with a range of 0-457 days. Patients with commercial pharmacy insurance were 3 times more likely to have a longer time to medication access (odds ratios [OR]: 3.40, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.5-6.1, Conclusions: Over a quarter of patients prescribed SC vedolizumab or infliximab do not start due to payer restrictions or patient preference. Patients with commercial insurance may be less likely to access SC therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.