ArticleERJ open research2026
Aetiology, management and outcomes of eosinophilic pleural effusion: data from the International Multicentre Pleural Research Collaborative.
Article in ERJ open research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Should we care about pleural eosinophils?ERJ open research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Eosinophilic pleural effusion (EPE) is a relatively uncommon condition. The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical, laboratory and radiological features of EPE in a multicentre cohort of patients. Methods: This retrospective study included patients with EPE, defined as pleural fluid in which eosinophils constitute ≥10% of the total nucleated cell count, treated between 2009 and 2021 at eight respiratory centres. Predefined data were collected in the International Multicentre Pleural Research Collaborative (IMPACT) registry. Results: The study included 210 patients (144 (68.6%) males), with a median age of 67 years (interquartile range (IQR) 55-78 years). Radiological evaluation showed unilateral effusion in 194 (94.2%) patients. Most EPEs (199; 95.7%) were exudates. The median pleural fluid eosinophil percentage was 23% (IQR 14.8-43.3%). The most common aetiologies were malignancy (n=61, 29%), infection (n=43, 20.5%), heart diseases/cardiac intervention (n=17, 8.1%) or trauma (n=16, 7.6%). In 42 (20%) patients, the cause of EPE remained undetermined. In univariate and multivariable analyses incorporating available clinical and laboratory data, EPE was not a significant predictor of either malignancy or benign disease. Conclusion: EPE is a nonspecific diagnostic entity and should not, by itself, be regarded as a relevant factor in clinical decision-making.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.