Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42577704›Full record

ArticleCase reports in perinatal medicine2026

Prenatal manifestations and perinatal outcomes in congenital myotonic dystrophy: clinical patterns and diagnostic implications.

Nawras Zayat, Tori Aspir, Eliane Shinder, Susan Wu, Emily Suskin, Sameer Khan, Sara Rabin-Havt, Pe'er Dar, Georgios Doulaveris

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Case reports in perinatal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Nawras ZayatDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, NY, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9027-1514
Tori AspirDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Women's Health, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, NY, USA.
Eliane ShinderDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Women's Health, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, NY, USA.
Susan WuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook University, Renaissance School of Medicine, Stony Brook, New York, NY, USA.
Emily SuskinDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Medical and Reproductive Genetics, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, NY, USA.
Sameer KhanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, NY, USA.
Sara Rabin-HavtDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Medical and Reproductive Genetics, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, NY, USA.
Pe'er DarDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, NY, USA.
Georgios DoulaverisDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: This work aims to characterize the clinical manifestations and diagnostic challenges associated with pregnancies affected by congenital myotonic dystrophy through a detailed case report of an individual seen in our center and a comprehensive case series overview. Case presentation: A 33-year-old woman presented at 33 weeks-gestation with symptomatic severe polyhydramnios (AFI 55.2) and an otherwise uncomplicated prenatal course with no anomalies on ultrasound. She underwent amnioreduction, which initially revealed normal genetic testing results (46,XX karyotype and normal microarray). At 34 weeks, she underwent repeat cesarean delivery for new-onset non-immune hydrops fetalis. Because of the hydrops, severe hypotonia, and respiratory distress requiring intubation of the neonate, further genetic testing was performed and was positive for congenital myotonic dystrophy (1,880 CTG repeats in DMPK). This testing also indicated that the mother had >200 repeats, consistent with myotonic dystrophy type 1. Conclusions: Idiopathic polyhydramnios and non-immune hydrops fetalis, even in the absence of structural anomalies, should prompt consideration of neuromuscular conditions such as congenital myotonic dystrophy in the differential diagnosis.

Indexed as

congenital myotonic dystrophygrip myotoniahydrops fetalispolyhydramniospregnancypregnancy complications

Identifiers

PMID42577704
PMCPMC13454811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.