ArticleCase reports in perinatal medicine2026
Prenatal manifestations and perinatal outcomes in congenital myotonic dystrophy: clinical patterns and diagnostic implications.
Article in Case reports in perinatal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This work aims to characterize the clinical manifestations and diagnostic challenges associated with pregnancies affected by congenital myotonic dystrophy through a detailed case report of an individual seen in our center and a comprehensive case series overview. Case presentation: A 33-year-old woman presented at 33 weeks-gestation with symptomatic severe polyhydramnios (AFI 55.2) and an otherwise uncomplicated prenatal course with no anomalies on ultrasound. She underwent amnioreduction, which initially revealed normal genetic testing results (46,XX karyotype and normal microarray). At 34 weeks, she underwent repeat cesarean delivery for new-onset non-immune hydrops fetalis. Because of the hydrops, severe hypotonia, and respiratory distress requiring intubation of the neonate, further genetic testing was performed and was positive for congenital myotonic dystrophy (1,880 CTG repeats in DMPK). This testing also indicated that the mother had >200 repeats, consistent with myotonic dystrophy type 1. Conclusions: Idiopathic polyhydramnios and non-immune hydrops fetalis, even in the absence of structural anomalies, should prompt consideration of neuromuscular conditions such as congenital myotonic dystrophy in the differential diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.