Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42577689›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of public health2026

From randomised trial to national implementation: employment outcomes from individual placement and support in english alcohol and drug treatment services.

Claire Shaw, Nishanthini Oppilamany, Paul Anders, Jez Stannard, Emma Knight, Amy Baxter, John Marsden

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Claire ShawOffice for Health Improvement and Disparities, Department of Health and Social Care (DSHC), London, United Kingdom.
Nishanthini OppilamanyOffice for Health Improvement and Disparities, Department of Health and Social Care (DSHC), London, United Kingdom.
Paul AndersOffice for Health Improvement and Disparities, Department of Health and Social Care (DSHC), London, United Kingdom.
Jez StannardOffice for Health Improvement and Disparities, Department of Health and Social Care (DSHC), London, United Kingdom.
Emma KnightOffice for Health Improvement and Disparities, Department of Health and Social Care (DSHC), London, United Kingdom.
Amy BaxterOffice for Health Improvement and Disparities, Department of Health and Social Care (DSHC), London, United Kingdom.
John MarsdenAddictions Department, School of Academic Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To compare employment outcomes reported by a completed randomised controlled trial (IPS-AD: Individual Placement and Support - Alcohol and Drug Dependence) with those observed during the English national expansion of IPS services, and to identify factors associated with improved outcomes. Methods: This was a secondary comparative analysis of five employment outcomes - employment rate, time to employment attainment, job tenure (longest single appointment duration), total time employed and job sustainment defined as ≥13 consecutive weeks employment, in two cohorts: the IPS-AD study intervention arm (n = 843) and IPS expansion participants (n = 3,182). Results: Compared with the IPS-AD cohort, the expansion cohort showed a higher employment rate (52% versus 30%; p-value <0.001); faster employment attainment (143 versus 180 days; p-value <0.001); longer job tenure (254 versus 110 days; p-value <0.001); greater total time employed (300 versus 133 days; p-value <0.001); and higher job sustainment (76% versus 42%; p-value <0.001). Conclusion: Expansion outcomes were consistently more favourable than those observed in the IPS-AD study. Factors that may have contributed to improved outcomes included implementation and delivery enhancements, broadened eligibility criteria, and favourable environmental and economic conditions.

Indexed as

AlcoholismEmploymentEmployment, SupportedSubstance Abuse Treatment CentersSubstance-Related DisordersAdultEnglandFemaleHumansJob SecurityMalealcohol and drug dependenceemployment supportindividual placement and supportservice improvementsubstance use disorder

Identifiers

PMID42577689
PMCPMC13454831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.