Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42577609›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2026

Evaluating user enjoyment, engagement, and intention to play in edugames4all MicrobeQuest!

Andreea Molnar, Patty Kostkova

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Andreea MolnarDepartment of Computing Technology, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, VIC, Australia.
Patty KostkovaUCL Centre for Digital Public Health in Emergencies, Department for Risk & Disaster Reduction, and Collaborating Centre for Digital Public Health and Pandemic Preparedness, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The widespread use of mobile phones among children and the growing popularity of games in this age group have led to the development of mobile learning applications, including educational health games. However, many of these games either fail to present healthcare topics in an engaging way for children or are still in early development stages. Although there is increasing research interest in serious educational health games for children, their appeal, such as enjoyment, engagement, and intention to play, is often not properly evaluated. However enjoyment is what motivates the use of games for learning especially for children, and educational games must be engaging and rewarding, as this fosters greater persistence, achievement, and completion outcomes among students. Methods: This research presents an evaluation of the appeal of a mobile educational game, Edugames4all MicrobeQuest!, designed to promote hygiene and responsible antibiotic use among primary school children. The evaluation focuses on three dimensions of appeal: enjoyment, engagement, and intention to play, and relationship between them. The study included 19 participants. Results: The findings indicate that the game was generally appealing to children across all three evaluated dimensions. It also shows a strong and positive correlation between enjoyment, engagement and intention to play. Conclusions: Evaluating the appeal of educational health games is important, as it cannot be assumed that children will enjoy them simply because they are games. The study shows that the evaluated game successfully achieved a good level of appeal among its target audience. The three constructs are positively correlated.

Indexed as

IntentionMobile ApplicationsPleasureStudentsVideo GamesChildFemaleHumansHygieneMaleMotivationAMRantibiotic resistanceengagementenjoymentgames for healthhand washinghygieneintention to play

Identifiers

PMID42577609
PMCPMC13454355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.