ArticleCirculation reports2026
Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Venous Thromboembolism Between Weekend Diagnosis and Weekday Diagnosis in the Direct Oral Anticoagulant Era: Insights From the COMMAND VTE Registry-2.
Article in Circulation reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
39 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Data on the association of weekend vs. weekday diagnosis with clinical outcomes of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in the direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) era are limited. Methods and Results: The COMMAND VTE Registry-2 is a multicenter registry that enrolled 5,197 consecutive acute symptomatic VTE patients from 31 centers in Japan between January 2015 and August 2020. Baseline characteristics, anticoagulation strategies, and 30-day outcomes were compared between patients diagnosed on weekends (n=537; 10.3%) and those diagnosed on weekdays (n=4,660, 89.7%). Compared with patients diagnosed on weekdays, those diagnosed on weekends more frequently presented with pulmonary embolism (PE; 74.7% vs. 51.2%; P<0.001) and more often received thrombolysis and cardiopulmonary support. The cumulative 30-day incidence of all-cause death in PE patients was significantly higher in patients diagnosed on weekends than in those diagnosed on weekdays (7.5% vs. 4.1%; P=0.003), but the difference was not significant after multivariable adjustment (hazard ratio 1.51; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.99-2.30; P=0.056). The 30-day risk of major bleeding was significantly higher in weekend PE patients after multivariable adjustment (hazard ratio 1.79; 95% CI 1.11-2.88; P=0.02). Conclusions: VTE patients diagnosed on weekends presented more often with PE and with greater severity. Although the higher crude 30-day mortality in weekend PE patients was attenuated after adjustment, a weekend diagnosis remained associated with higher 30-day major bleeding risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.