Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42577447›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in sports and active living2026

A sixteen-year epidemiological study of match injuries sustained during the women's Rugby World Cup (2010 to 2025).

Colin W Fuller, Aileen Taylor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Colin W FullerColin Fuller Consultancy Ltd, Sutton Bonington, United Kingdom.
Aileen TaylorColin Fuller Consultancy Ltd, Nairobi, Kenya.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Professionalisation of women's rugby has increased over the past ten years. The impact of this development on the incidence and nature of injuries sustained during international competitions has not been reported. This study aimed to provide anthropometric and epidemiological information relating to women's international Rugby-15s. Methods: Team medical staff, working with eighteen national teams taking part in five women's Rugby World Cups over the period 2010-2025, recorded players' anthropometric and injury data. The observational methodology used in the study followed the international consensus statement for surveillance studies in elite rugby. Data relating to the incidence, severity, burden, nature and cause of injuries were collected. Results: The overall incidence of injury over the 16-year period was 45.2 injuries/1,000 player-match-hours with a mean severity of 48.4 days. Concussion (21.7%), knee-ligament (12.5%) and ankle-ligament (10.8%) injuries were the most common injuries sustained by backs and knee-ligament (17.2%), concussion (14.2%) and ankle-ligament (8.2%) injuries the most common for forwards. Knee-ligament injuries were responsible for 33.0% of all time-loss by backs and 43.2% of all time-loss by forwards. Discussion: The incidence of injury during the women's Rugby World Cup was significantly lower but the mean severity of the injuries significantly higher than values reported previously for the men's Rugby World Cup. Consequently, injury burden values during the women's and men's Rugby World Cups are similar. Knee-ligament and concussion injuries should be the focus of injury prevention initiatives in women's rugby, as they are the most common injuries and are responsible for the greatest time-loss.

Indexed as

burdenconcussionincidenceknee ligamentnatureseverity

Identifiers

PMID42577447
PMCPMC13454045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.