Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42577436›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2026

Building bridges between public health and computer science departments in academia to foster artificial intelligence knowledge and skills for the digital age.

Seble Frehywot, Michael Cowling, Evangelos Pappas, Yianna Vovides

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Seble Frehywot *Department of Global Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC, United States.
Michael CowlingHub for Apple Platform Innovation (HAPI), School of Computing Technologies, STEM College, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology (RMIT) University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Evangelos PappasSchool of Health and Biomedical Sciences, MedTech Research and Innovation Hub, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology (RMIT) University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Yianna Vovides *Co-Founder IT for Health and Education Systems Equity (ITfHESE), Washington, DC, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current communication gap between Public Health (PH) and Computer Science (CS) academics is striking: public health professionals speak in terms of incidence rates, risk factors, interventions, health systems, health policy, and equity, while computer scientists converse in neural networks, optimization functions, scalability, and computational complexity. This linguistic and cultural divide often prevents natural collaboration, leaving valuable opportunities unexplored. In this Artificial Intelligence (AI) era, regardless of whether they are in high-, middle-, or low-income countries, these two departments stand to gain immensely from forging a simple yet powerful bridge between themselves. Connecting through joint seminars, cross-listed courses, shared research projects, co-mentorship of students, and informal faculty and staff exchanges offers clear, immediate advantages: accelerated innovation in AI applications for public health challenges, enhanced employability for graduates entering a job market hungry for "AI-savvy" health professionals, and the cultivation of ethical, context-aware AI solutions that truly serve populations rather than merely advancing technology. Yet overcoming institutional barriers such as siloed budgets, geographical barriers (different buildings, districts, or campuses), differing promotion criteria, or scheduling conflicts and cultural ones, such as mutual unfamiliarity with each other's priorities, demands deliberate but feasible strategic planning. This perspective article articulates these benefits and challenges and then concludes with a set of strategies, proposed by a group of public health, health, and computer science academics, to break this divide and build a bridge between PH and CS.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligencePublic HealthAcademiaHumansacademic bridgingartificial intelligencedigital public healthinterdisciplinary collaborationpublic health and computer science

Identifiers

PMID42577436
PMCPMC13454473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.