ReviewFrontiers in public health2026
Post-intervention durability of standalone digital behavior change interventions for physical activity in adults: a focused mini review and quantitative synthesis.
Review in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Standalone digital behavior change interventions (DBCIs) are increasingly used to promote physical activity (PA), but their post-intervention durability remains unclear. This focused mini review with quantitative synthesis examined maintenance and attenuation of standalone DBCI effects on PA in adults. Methods: PubMed, Web of Science Core Collection, and SPORTDiscus were searched without date restrictions, with the final search conducted on 3 May 2026. Eligible studies were randomized controlled studies involving adults, standalone DBCIs targeting PA, a comparator not receiving the target structured DBCI, and PA outcomes assessed post-intervention and at ≥1 follow-up. Random-effects meta-analyses used Hedges' g, with the longest follow-up used for the primary maintenance analysis. Results: Seventeen studies involving 8,990 participants were included in the review, of which 13 contributed effect sizes to the primary quantitative synthesis. Standalone DBCIs showed a small, non-significant effect at the longest follow-up ( Conclusion: Standalone DBCIs showed small positive post-intervention point estimates, but evidence remains insufficient to establish reliable maintenance after active support is reduced or withdrawn. Future studies should use repeated follow-ups and report engagement, continued tool access, and post-intervention support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.