ArticleFrontiers in digital health2026
Refugee-centered framework for design of digital health interventions: a qualitative study with Ukrainian refugee women in Norway.
Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Ukrainian refugee women face multiple barriers when accessing healthcare systems in host countries, including language challenges, differences in healthcare system structures, prior experiences, and issues of trust and expectations. Digital health interventions have been increasingly used to support access to health information and services for refugee populations. However, evidence remains limited regarding how refugee women understand, navigate, and engage with digital health within host country healthcare systems. This study aims to identify the needs and expectations of Ukrainian refugee women in relation to digital health and healthcare navigation in Norway, and to develop a refugee-centered, empirically grounded framework to inform the design of digital health interventions that support equitable healthcare access. Methods: A qualitative design was employed, including five age-segmented focus group discussions with thirty Ukrainian refugee women aged 18-24, 25-54, and 55+ years. Participants also completed a pre-study questionnaire documenting demographic characteristics and prior use of digital health. Data were analyzed thematically and subsequently interpreted through a user experience framework as an analytical lens. Results: Nine overarching themes were identified, describing navigation challenges shaped by prior system experiences, age-related differences in information use, prevention priorities, trust, language accessibility, the need for step-by-step guidance, information structure and usability, digital overload, and the cautious use of artificial intelligence and digital contact tools. Discussion: These findings were further synthesized into user-centered design requirements for digital health interventions. Based on these findings, a refugee-centered framework is proposed for designing digital health interventions. The framework identifies six core components: navigation and pathway guidance, age-responsive design, trust and verification, language and cultural adaptation, artificial intelligence-supported features, and cognitive ease, accessibility, and universal design. Conclusions: This study contributes to more equitable and user-centered digital health design by translating the lived experiences of Ukrainian refugee women into actionable design principles that support navigable, trustworthy, and linguistically accessible healthcare systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.