ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Psychological inflexibility and insomnia as serial mediators of the link between social media addiction and romantic relationship quality.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Widespread social media use may be one of the most important factors influencing individuals' romantic relationships. In particular, excessive, uncontrolled, and problematic social media use may negatively affect both individuals' psychological processes and their relational functioning in interpersonal interactions. The aim of the present study is to examine the serial predicting roles of psychological inflexibility and insomnia in the relationship between social media addiction and romantic relationship quality. The sample consisted of 466 adults from different regions of Türkiye. Of the participants, 368 were female (79%) and 98 were male (21%). The mean age of the participants, whose ages ranged from 18 to 72, was 34.32 years (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.