ArticleFrontiers in epidemiology2026
Dynamic trajectories in visual function and fall risk in older adults.
Article in Frontiers in epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: Visual impairment is associated with falls in older adults, but whether changes in vision alter this risk is unclear. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study using data from the National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS), a nationally representative survey of Medicare beneficiaries aged ≥65 years. Distance acuity, near acuity, and contrast sensitivity were measured in 2022 and 2023. Change from 2022-2023 was calculated and categorized as stable (to ±0.1 logMAR), improving, or worsening. Using multivariable survey-weighted logistic regression, we compared the following fall-related outcomes in 2024: any fall in the last month, any fall in the last year, or multiple falls in the last year. Results: Among 6,327 eligible participants, distance acuity trends from 2022-2023 were stable in 50.3%, improved in 19.5%, and worsened in 30.2%. Similar patterns were observed for near acuity and contrast sensitivity. Worsening distance acuity was associated with higher odds of a fall in the past year (aOR 1.44, 95% CI 1.03-2.02), and worsening near acuity was associated with higher odds of a fall in the last month (aOR 1.44, 95% CI 1.3-2.02). Improvements in distance acuity, near acuity, and contrast sensitivity from 2022-23 were not associated with lower odds of falls in 2024. Conclusions: Worsening vision is associated with an increased risk of falls, but improving vision does not appear to reduce this risk. These findings suggest that while efforts to improve vision may not prevent falls, preventing a decline in visual function may help to reduce fall risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.