ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2026
Automatic identification of postural transitions using a single inertial measurement unit and dynamic time warping: a pilot study in healthy individuals and people with Parkinson's disease.
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Postural transitions (PTs) are crucial daily movements often impaired in neurological conditions, impacting autonomy and fall risk. Wearable inertial measurement units (IMUs) enable objective assessment of PTs, but robust algorithms for automatic identification remain limited. Methods: This pilot study used Dynamic Time Warping (DTW), a time-series alignment method that is robust to temporal variations, to automatically identify PTs in healthy subjects (HS) and subjects with Parkinson's Disease (SwPD). For this purpose, 10 participants (5 HS and 5 SwPD) performed 5 postural transition tasks (sit-to-stand, stand-to-sit, supine-to-sit, sit-to-supine, and roll) using a sternum-mounted IMU. Reference PT patterns were generated from previously collected acceleration data representing optimally executed transitions. The DTW algorithm classified each detected candidate transition by minimizing its distance from predefined reference patterns. Classification performance indexes were statistically compared between groups. Results: Within this pilot dataset, the DTW algorithm correctly identified 118/118 postural-transition signals in HS and 136/147 signals in SwPD. Misclassifications in SwPD primarily affected sit-to-stand (31%) and stand-to-sit (19%) transitions. Discussion: These preliminary findings support the feasibility of a DTW-based approach for postural-transition identification, although larger independent validation studies are required. Future work should prioritize real-time deployment and larger validation cohorts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.