ArticleFrontiers in digital health2026
User demographics and real-world use of the digital diabetes companion app dibi: a retrospective analysis.
Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Type 2 Diabetes (T2D) is a chronic condition requiring lifelong personalized management to prevent disease progression and complications. Mobile health applications like dibi can substantially support patients in daily disease management. Objective: This study analyzes user demographics, self-reported treatment characteristics, and early feature use among users of the dibi digital diabetes companion app to better understand app uptake and feature use, advance personalized care and facilitate predictive healthcare strategies. Methods: Of 5,744 dibi users, 2,422 (42.2%) provided consent and completed registration (date: 15.12.24). Users were included if they had active consent and were aged ≥18 years, resulting in 2,262 users for the main analysis. Users with missing or invalid entries were excluded from respective parameter-specific analysis. Among all included users, 1,253 (55.3%) defined at least one medication plan with overall 1,039 unique medications, and 514 (22.7%) users utilized the adherence feature at least once to track medication intake. Results: Of the included users, 89.4% were patients with T2D, mostly male (57.5%), aged 56-65 years (33.5%) and recently diagnosed (0-1 year since self-reported diagnosis). Female T2D users appeared to be distributed toward younger age groups than male users and more often chose lifestyle changes only during onboarding. Most T2D users (36.9%) reported either treatment with oral antidiabetics (OAD) only or lifestyle modifications alone (17.1%). Of the T2D patients who used medication plans, the majority (57.0%) reported using only OADs, while 7.2% reported only non-diabetes medications. More escalated treatment regimens were observed with longer disease duration. While 87.5% confirmed medication intake at least once, 29.6% used the adherence feature only once. Conclusion: This analysis demonstrates that the dibi app reached a predominantly T2D user population in Germany. It provides insights into treatment patterns and patient reported lifestyle changes. The dibi cohort reflects trends seen in other studies, representing real-world disease management. These findings indicate that inclusion of medical questionnaires, and clinical metrics, such as HbA1c, will deepen our understanding of the disease and enable treatment-lifestyle correlations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.