Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42577375›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2026

Hybrid CNN with angular margin supervision for robust face identification and verification.

Andisani Nemavhola, Colin Chibaya, Serestina Viriri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Andisani NemavholaSchool of Consumer Intelligence and Information Systems, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Colin ChibayaSchool of Natural and Applied Sciences, Sol Plaatje University, Kimberley, South Africa.
Serestina ViririSchool of Mathematics, Statistics and Computer Science, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Face recognition systems are widely used in surveillance, biometric authentication, access control, and digital identity verification; however, supervision sensitivity, evaluation stability, and performance consistency across datasets remain insufficiently understood. This study investigates the behavior of convolutional, transformer-based, and hybrid face recognition architectures under both Softmax and ArcFace supervision using five-fold subject-disjoint cross-validation on the Labeled Faces in the Wild (LFW) and FAGEv2 datasets. ResNet50, MobileNetV3, DeiT-Small, and a Hybrid multi-branch architecture integrating complementary convolutional and transformer feature representations were evaluated using Top-1 identification accuracy, Area Under the ROC Curve (AUC), Equal Error Rate (EER), computational complexity, and fold-level statistical analysis. Experimental results revealed substantial supervision sensitivity across architectures and datasets. On the LFW dataset, Hybrid-Softmax achieved the highest Top-1 identification accuracy (62.4%), while DeiT-Small-Softmax achieved the strongest verification performance with an AUC of 0.905 and EER of 0.159. On the FAGEv2 dataset, Hybrid-Softmax and DeiT-Small-Softmax achieved the highest identification accuracy (38.0%), while Hybrid-Softmax achieved the strongest verification performance with an AUC of 0.825 and EER of 0.251. Fold-level analyses demonstrated that the effect of ArcFace supervision varied across architectures and datasets, with consistent improvements observed for some convolutional architectures but not for transformer-based or hybrid models. Cross-dataset evaluation further revealed changes in model ranking and supervision behavior, indicating that comparative performance is strongly influenced by dataset characteristics and evaluation conditions. The findings demonstrate that additive angular margin supervision does not universally outperform conventional Softmax optimization and highlight the importance of multi-dataset benchmarking, fold-level evaluation, and supervision sensitivity analysis for robust and reproducible face recognition benchmarking.

Indexed as

angular margin learningArcFace lossbiometric verificationface recognitionhybrid convolutional neural networkSoftmax loss

Identifiers

PMID42577375
PMCPMC13454437

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.