Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42577368›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in digital health2026

From behavioral signals to therapy management: a real-world pilot implementation of human-in-the-loop AI workflow in proactive patient care.

David Dickerson, Koeun Lim, Caitlin Tourjé, Ramo Naidu, Lindsey Cianni, Andrew B Kibler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

David Dickerson *Endeavor Health, Chicago, IL, United States.
Koeun Lim *BIOTRONIK NRO Inc., Lake Oswego, OR, United States.
Caitlin TourjéSpanish Hills Interventional P&S, Camarillo, CA, United States.
Ramo NaiduMarinHealth Spine Ins., Larkspur, CA, United States.
Lindsey CianniBIOTRONIK NRO Inc., Lake Oswego, OR, United States.
Andrew B KiblerBIOTRONIK NRO Inc., Lake Oswego, OR, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is an established therapy for chronic pain, but post-implant care depends on timely identification of evolving patient needs. Remote monitoring may help detect therapy-use changes that scheduled follow-up and patient-initiated contact can miss. We evaluated Proactive Intelligence, a workflow-integrated, human-in-the-loop AI recommender using passively collected SCS device-interaction data to support care without added patients' data-entry burden. Methods: We conducted a prospective, observational real-world pilot among research-consented patients implanted with Prospera SCS devices. Proactive Intelligence used a hybrid neural network incorporating longitudinal therapy-use patterns, operational variables, and patient history/demography to identify patient-days with therapy-adjustment-associated patterns. Model outputs were translated into a prioritized daily review list for the Embrace Care Team (ECT), which reviewed cases, performed outreach when appropriate, adjudicated behavioral-change reasons, and recorded downstream patient care actions. Outcomes included model enrichment, field adjudication yield, intervention distribution, and pain-score change after outreach when follow-up pain scores were available. Results: Model development used data from 747 permanently implanted patients with sufficient telemetry. Confirmed reprogramming events were rare, occurring at 0.77% per patient-day. At the high-specificity threshold, the model achieved a positive predictive value of 28.8% and sensitivity of 8.6% on a held-out test set, corresponding to approximately 37-fold enrichment over baseline prevalence. During the pilot, predictions were generated across 101,042 patient-days. Across 91 operational days, the ECT reviewed 188 cases involving 175 unique patients. Among reviewed cases, 152 patients responded within three outreach attempts, yielding an 80.9% response rate. Of all reviewed cases, 66.0% were adjudicated as "therapy-related." Among reachable patients, the therapy-related yield was 81.6%, and "Address therapy" actions occurred in 67.8% of cases, including reprogramming and therapy adjustment/discussion. Among cases with follow-up pain scores, therapy-relevant cases showed significant mean NRS reduction after outreach, with improvement after both reprogramming and non-reprogramming therapy adjustment. Discussion: To our knowledge, this pilot represents the first real-world evaluation of an ECT driven, human-in-the-loop care workflow supported by passively collected SCS device interaction data, without added patient data-entry burden. The findings suggest that machine learning can assist longitudinal SCS care by surfacing behaviorally meaningful changes for timely human review, contextual interpretation, and coordinated support.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencedigital health implementationhuman-in-the-loop AIneuromodulationpatient care decision supportpatient care workflow integrationpost-implant careremote monitoring

Identifiers

PMID42577368
PMCPMC13454061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.