ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
How and when does artificial intelligence use enhance student creativity? The mediating role of knowledge-based dynamic capabilities.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As artificial intelligence (AI) becomes more deeply integrated into higher education, understanding its effects on student creativity has become increasingly important. However, the mechanisms through which AI use is associated with student creativity, as well as the boundary conditions of this relationship, remain insufficiently understood. Drawing on the knowledge-based dynamic capabilities (KBDC) framework, this study develops and tests a model that links AI use to student creativity while incorporating the moderating roles of AI self-efficacy and AI trust. Using survey data from 764 university students in China, we employ hierarchical regression analysis to examine the proposed model. The results show that AI use is positively associated with student creativity and that this relationship is mediated by students' knowledge acquisition, absorptive, and combination capabilities. Furthermore, AI self-efficacy strengthens the positive effects of AI use on all three capability dimensions, whereas AI trust weakens the effects on knowledge acquisition and absorptive capabilities. In doing so, this study advances research on AI use and student creativity by unpacking one important capability-based mediating pathway and the boundary conditions under which this relationship is stronger or weaker. It also contributes to the KBDC literature by extending the application of KBDC theory from the organizational to the individual level and demonstrating how these capabilities operate in AI-enabled learning contexts. The findings offer practical implications for educators, universities, students, and policymakers seeking to foster creative and reflective AI-supported learning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.