ArticleFrontiers in oral health2026
Clinical and anatomical characteristics of mandibular angle fractures: a 10-year retrospective monocentric cohort study.
Article in Frontiers in oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Mandibular angle fractures represent a distinct subgroup of mandibular fractures with unique anatomical and biomechanical characteristics. However, factors influencing fracture patterns and treatment complexity remain incompletely understood. This study aimed to characterize the clinical, anatomical, and morphological features of mandibular angle fractures and to identify factors associated with fracture behavior. Methods: This retrospective monocentric cohort study included 115 patients treated for mandibular angle fractures at a tertiary referral center between January 2015 and December 2025. Demographic, fracture related, radiological, morphological, dental, and treatment variables were retrospectively collected and analyzed to evaluate factors associated with fracture patterns, treatment complexity, and clinical outcomes. Results: Of 115 patients, 104 (90.4%) were male and 11 (9.6%) were female. Female patients were significantly older than male patients ( Conclusion: Mandibular angle fractures appear to be primarily influenced by anatomical and biomechanical characteristics rather than trauma mechanism alone. Craniofacial morphology, age, and dental status may contribute to fracture patterns and treatment complexity, supporting a more individualized assessment of mandibular angle fractures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.