ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2026
Analysis of the clinical features of chest pain in adolescents and children in the Shihezi area of Xinjiang.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the causes and clinical characteristics of chest pain in adolescents aged 8-17 years in the Shihezi area of Xinjiang, and to provide reference for clinical diagnosis and treatment. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 243 children aged 8-17 years who presented with non-traumatic chest pain at the Pediatric Emergency and Outpatient Department of the First Affiliated Hospital of Shihezi University from January 2023 to December 2024. Clinical data, including medical history, physical examination findings, laboratory tests, and imaging studies, were collected. Continuous variables were compared using one-way analysis of variance or the Kruskal-Wallis test, and categorical variables were compared using the chi-square test or Fisher's exact test, as appropriate. An exploratory multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to assess factors associated with cardiac chest pain classification. Results: Non-cardiac causes were the most common reason for chest pain (47.7%), followed by cardiac causes (20.6%), while the cause remained undetermined in 31.7% of the cases. Work-rest relationship, NRS score, shortness of breath, and palpitations differed significantly among the three groups, whereas chest pain duration, syncope, and fatigue did not. Sex distribution showed a borderline difference among groups ( Conclusion: Clinicians should emphasize detailed history taking and physical examination and select auxiliary tests according to clinical risk features. Chest x-ray and pulmonary function abnormalities were more frequent in patients with respiratory diagnoses, whereas abnormal electrocardiography and elevated myocardial biomarkers were more common in patients classified as having cardiac chest pain. However, these findings indicate associations rather than diagnostic accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.