ArticleJMA journal2026
Association of Maternal Nationality with Stillbirth and Infant Mortality: An Analysis of National Data in Japan.
Article in JMA journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This study investigated the association of maternal nationality with stillbirth and infant mortality in Japan. Methods: The Vital Statistics data in Japan from 2010 to 2023 were used, and singleton births born from 2010 to 2022 were used in the analysis of stillbirth and infant mortality. The maternal nationality consisted of Japan, Korea, China, the Philippines, Thailand, the United States (US), Brazil, Peru, and other countries in the analysis. Stillbirth and infant mortality rates were calculated by maternal nationalities. In addition, modified Poisson regression models were used to investigate the associations between the outcomes and maternal nationality, and residential area, parity, maternal age, marital status, and year of birth were adjusted. Results: Data on 12,287,030 live births and 33,968 stillbirths were analyzed. As a result, the stillbirth rate for American mothers was the highest, and that of "other countries" was the second highest. In addition, the infant mortality rate of American mothers was also the highest. The multivariate regression analysis revealed that mothers from the US and "other countries" had a significantly higher risk of stillbirth than Japanese mothers and mothers from the US had a significantly higher risk of infant mortality than Japanese mothers. Conclusions: It was suggested that support before and after childbirth is particularly necessary for American mothers in Japan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.