ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Vaccine hesitancy among Saudi parents of children in Abha City, Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Vaccine hesitancy remains an important global public health concern despite the success of childhood immunization programs. Parental concerns regarding vaccine safety, side effects, and misinformation may negatively influence vaccine uptake and contribute to delayed or refused childhood vaccination. This study aimed to assess vaccine hesitancy among Saudi parents in Abha City and identify factors associated with hesitant attitudes toward compulsory childhood vaccination. Methods: A cross-sectional analytical study was conducted among 382 Saudi parents of children younger than 12 years in Abha City, Saudi Arabia, between 1 January and 30 April 2025. Data were collected using a structured Arabic questionnaire assessing sociodemographic characteristics, vaccine knowledge, attitudes, trust, and vaccination behaviors. A composite vaccine hesitancy score was calculated, and participants with scores ≥11 were classified as having high vaccine hesitancy. Firth penalized logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors independently associated with high vaccine hesitancy. Data were analyzed using R statistical software version 4.4.3. Results: Most participants demonstrated good awareness regarding compulsory childhood vaccination, with 96.9% reporting familiarity with the national immunization schedule. Although overall vaccine confidence was high, 46.1% of participants reported concerns regarding vaccine side effects, and 35.6% had previously delayed or refused a compulsory vaccine for their child. Overall, 5.2% of participants demonstrated high vaccine hesitancy. Firth penalized logistic regression analysis showed that parents older than 40 years (adjusted OR = 6.62, 95% CI: 1.65-38.89, Conclusion: Although vaccine hesitancy was relatively low among Saudi parents in Abha City, concerns regarding vaccine safety and side effects remain common. Targeted educational interventions, effective healthcare communication, and strategies addressing vaccine misinformation are essential to maintain public confidence in childhood immunization programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.