Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42577270›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2026

Effects of maternal exposure to an adsorbed acellular diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis (reduced-dose) combined vaccine on prenatal and postnatal development in Sprague-Dawley rats: a preclinical study.

Wenlu Kong, Han Chu, Qin Gu, Yan Ma, Lukui Cai, Jingyan Li, Xiaoyu Wang, Qiuyan Ji, Jiana Wen, Na Gao and 14 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Wenlu Kong *Institute of Medical Biology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Kunming, China.
Han Chu *Institute of Medical Biology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Kunming, China.
Qin GuInstitute of Medical Biology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Kunming, China.
Yan MaInstitute of Medical Biology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Kunming, China.
Lukui CaiInstitute of Medical Biology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Kunming, China.
Jingyan LiInstitute of Medical Biology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Kunming, China.
Xiaoyu WangInstitute of Medical Biology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Kunming, China.
Qiuyan JiInstitute of Medical Biology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Kunming, China.
Jiana WenInstitute of Medical Biology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Kunming, China.
Na GaoInstitute of Medical Biology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Kunming, China.
Guang JiInstitute of Medical Biology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Kunming, China.
Wenzhu HuInstitute of Medical Biology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Kunming, China.
Ting ZhaoInstitute of Medical Biology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Kunming, China.
Ling PingInstitute of Medical Biology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Kunming, China.
Yuting FuInstitute of Medical Biology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Kunming, China.
Ying LiInstitute of Medical Biology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Kunming, China.
Tiannan GongInstitute of Medical Biology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Kunming, China.
Yingfu JinInstitute of Medical Biology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Kunming, China.
Yufan YangInstitute of Medical Biology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Kunming, China.
Yixian FuInstitute of Medical Biology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Kunming, China.
Xinhua QinInstitute of Medical Biology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Kunming, China.
Huimei ZhengInstitute of Medical Biology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Kunming, China.
Jingsi YangInstitute of Medical Biology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Kunming, China.
Jiangli LiangInstitute of Medical Biology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Kunming, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The resurgence of pertussis poses a severe threat to infants under 3 months of age due to an inherent early-life "immunity gap." While maternal immunization with the tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis (Tdap/Tdacp) vaccine effectively mitigates this risk globally, no such vaccine is currently licensed for maternal use in China. This preclinical study aimed to systematically evaluate the reproductive and developmental toxicity, as well as the immunogenicity, of an independently developed Tdacp candidate vaccine in Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats. Methods: Eighty-eight female SD rats were randomly assigned to four groups: negative control, adjuvant control, low-dose (0.25 ml/rat), and high-dose (0.5 ml/rat). The vaccine was administered via intramuscular injection at three time points to maximize exposure: one week prior to mating, on gestation day 6 (GD 6), and on lactation day 7 (LD 7). Systemic assessments included maternal general toxicity, reproductive performance, and embryo-fetal development. Additionally, postnatal survival, physical growth, and neuro-reflex developmental landmarks of F1 offspring were monitored. Antigen-specific antibody titers in both F0 dams and F1 offspring were quantified to evaluate immunogenicity and maternal antibodies transfer. Results: Repeated maternal exposure to the Tdacp vaccine elicited no treatment-related maternal systemic toxicity; body weight, food consumption, and gestation length remained comparable to controls. No adverse effects were observed on mating, fertility, or uterine implantation. Furthermore, the vaccine did not negatively impact F1 offspring survival, sex ratio, physical morphology, or the acquisition of neuro-reflex milestones. Immunologically, the vaccine induced robust and stable antibody responses against all specific antigens, including pertussis toxin (PT), filamentous hemagglutinin (FHA), pertactin (PRN), diphtheria toxoid (DT), and tetanus toxoid (TT), in F0 dams. Crucially, high titers of these antigen-specific antibodies were detected in the F1 offspring, demonstrating successful passive transfer of maternal antibodies to the offspring. Conclusion: The investigational Tdacp vaccine demonstrated a highly favorable safety profile with no evidence of maternal, reproductive, or developmental toxicity. Coupled with its robust immunogenicity and efficient maternal antibody transfer, these findings provide pivotal preclinical validation to support advancing the vaccine into human clinical trials for maternal immunization.

Indexed as

Diphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis VaccinesMaternal ExposurePrenatal Exposure Delayed EffectsWhooping CoughAnimalsAntibodies, BacterialFemalePregnancyRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyVaccines, CombinedAntibodies, BacterialDiphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis VaccinesVaccines, Combinedmaternal antibody transfermaternal immunizationreproductive and developmental toxicitysafety evaluationTdacp vaccine

Identifiers

PMID42577270
PMCPMC13453739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.