ArticleJMA journal2026
Usefulness of Prognostic Stage in High-Risk Early Luminal Breast Cancer.
Article in JMA journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Breast cancer remains the most prevalent malignancy among women worldwide, with prognostic outcomes and therapeutic responses differing considerably across subtypes. The conventional staging framework developed by the Union for International Cancer Control (UICC), based on the Tumor, Node, Metastasis classification, reflects anatomical stage (AS) but overlooks biological characteristics. To address this limitation, the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) introduced the Prognostic Stage (PS) in its 8th edition, which integrates biomarkers including estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), and histological grade (HG). This study aimed to assess and compare the prognostic utility of UICC AS and AJCC PS in patients with high-risk luminal breast cancer. Methods: This retrospective study included patients who underwent surgery for ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer at Tokyo Metropolitan Komagome Hospital from 2011 to 2018. High-risk classification was defined based on MonarchE trial criteria: axillary lymph node metastasis, tumor diameter ≥5 cm, HG3, or Ki-67 ≥20%. Staging was performed using both UICC AS and AJCC PS, and prognostic values were evaluated via Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Results: Among 105 eligible cases, 43 (41%) were downstaged when reclassified from UICC AS to AJCC PS. While UICC AS failed to yield significant stratification in terms of invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) and distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS), AJCC PS demonstrated significant prognostic discrimination (IDFS p = 0.014; DRFS p = 0.004). Conclusions: American Joint Committee on Cancer PS offers superior prognostic stratification compared to UICC AS in high-risk luminal breast cancer. Its incorporation into clinical practice may enable more personalized treatment approaches, particularly when identifying candidates for adjuvant abemaciclib therapy. Further validation through larger, prospective studies is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.