ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Decoding Chinese speech across multiple neural conditions via EEG: dataset construction and interpretability driven spatial optimization.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A high-precision synchronization and centroid-based framework for single-trial decoding of perceived natural speech.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) technologies shows great potential in assisting patients with speech impairments and improving cognitive-linguistic decline. Electroencephalogram (EEG) based BCIs, characterized by non-invasiveness, low cost, and high temporal resolution, hold significant application value in speech decoding and cognitive rehabilitation. Currently, most mainstream public EEG datasets rely on Western languages. As a tonal language, Chinese Mandarin differs significantly from Western languages in speech production mechanisms, making existing data insufficient to support future BCI research for Mandarin-speaking patients. To address this gap, we establish a systematic Mandarin EEG dataset and conduct effective speech decoding and related analyses. We design four distinct experimental conditions, namely overt, overt-noisy, intend, and imagine, to simulate different types of speech disorders in clinical scenarios. Using typical Mandarin tonal-vowels and common vocabularies as stimuli, we construct an EEG dataset collected from a healthy adult. We evaluate the speech decoding performance using short-time Fourier transform combined with support vector machine (STFT-SVM) and EEG-Conformer models. Furthermore, we design a multi-task architecture based on the EEG-Conformer to perform a unified decoding task for the two stimulus types and a classification task across the four dataset conditions. To interpret the model, we combine Shapley value computation and decision trees to calculate the importance of different electrodes during classification. Experimental results show that the models achieve effective decoding on our dataset. The EEG-Conformer model performs significantly above chance level across all data, reaching an accuracy of 69.83% in normal speaking conditions and up to 61.46% in conditions simulating speech disorders. In the multi-task setting, the classification accuracy across different conditions exceeds 97%. By utilizing the important electrodes identified through interpretability methods as new feature inputs, the classification performance further improves even with a reduction of over 50% in the channels. These results demonstrate the potential of neural signal decoding technologies in communication assistance, reveal the decodability of Chinese Mandarin EEG datasets, and provide feasible recommendations for the future design of Chinese BCI applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.