Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42577108›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026

A four-miRNA serum panel as a diagnostic biomarker for prostate cancer: an exploratory and validation study.

Zuodong Yang, Zixiang Lai, Jiaodie Xie, Siwei Chen, Zhenjian Ge, Yongqing Lai, Hang Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Zuodong Yang *Department of Urology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Zixiang Lai *College of basic Medicine, Xinjiang medical university, Wulumuqi, China.
Jiaodie XiePeking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Siwei ChenDepartment of Urology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Zhenjian GeDepartment of Urology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Yongqing LaiDepartment of Urology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Hang LiDepartment of Urology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is widely used for prostate cancer (PC) screening, but its relatively low diagnostic accuracy may compromise early diagnosis and clinical management. There is an urgent need to identify convenient, cost-effective, and non-invasive diagnostic methods to reduce the rates of false positives and false negatives associated with PSA testing for prostate cancer. Serum miRNAs hold great promise as diagnostic tumor biomarkers. This study aimed to identify a novel serum miRNA panel for PC detection, with the goal of addressing the two major limitations of PSA: high false-positive and false-negative rates. Materials and methods: This study was conducted in three phases: biomarker screening, training, and validation. First, candidate miRNAs associated with prostate cancer were screened using the PubMed and ENCORI databases. Subsequently, real-time quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) was performed to analyze miRNA expression in serum samples from the training group: 28 PC and 28 normal controls (NC), and the validation group: 84 PC and 84 NC, and to identify differentially expressed miRNAs. We assessed their diagnostic performance using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and the area under the curve (AUC). We then constructed miRNA panel diagnostic models comprising different numbers of miRNAs to balance diagnostic performance and detection costs. Finally, bioinformatics analyses were performed to identify their target genes and functional pathways. Results: During the screening phase, 10 candidate miRNAs associated with PC were identified. In the training phase, 6 candidate miRNAs showed significant differential expression in PC compared with NC. In the validation phase, 5 candidate miRNAs (miR-101-3p, miR-154-5p, miR-199a-5p, miR-145-5p, and miR-30-5p) demonstrated favorable diagnostic performance for PC. After balancing diagnostic performance and detection costs, we ultimately selected the optimal 4-miRNA panel (miR-101-3p, miR-154-5p, miR-199a-5p, and miR-145-5p) as the final diagnostic biomarker panel for PC. This panel showed favorable diagnostic performance (AUC = 0.825, sensitivity = 83.33%, specificity = 69.05%). Bioinformatics analysis indicated that the Conclusion: A panel consisting of miR-101-3p, miR-154-5p, miR-199a-5p, and miR-145-5p exhibited excellent diagnostic efficacy for PC. This serum miRNA panel possesses translational potential and provides a novel strategy to address the two major limitations of PSA testing: high false-positive and false-negative rates. Clinical trial registration number: https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=187882, identifier ChiCTR2200066840.

Indexed as

bioinformaticsbiomarkerdiagnosismiRNAprostate cancerPSAserum biomarker

Identifiers

PMID42577108
PMCPMC13453685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.