ArticleFrontiers in plant science2026
A multimodal geospatial foundation model anticipates crop stress and yield failure across climates and species.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Climate extremes increasingly threaten agricultural production, yet many artificial intelligence systems in agriculture remain local, reactive and narrowly trained for one crop, region or sensing modality. Methods: We present AgriFM, a multimodal geospatial foundation model that combines satellite image time series, radar, thermal observations, weather trajectories, soil properties, topography and sparse management variables to estimate crop-stress and yield-failure risk across crops and regions. AgriFM was pretrained using self-supervised objectives on 2.4 million field-season sequences and evaluated on a curated benchmark spanning maize, wheat, soybean, rice and sorghum across five agroclimatic regions. Results: In held-out geography and time-split evaluations, AgriFM improved early stress detection and yield-failure prediction over statistical, crop-model and deep-learning baselines. The largest gains occurred during compound drought and heat events, for which AgriFM produced alerts 18 to 24 days earlier than the satellite-only baseline while maintaining improved calibration. Phenology-conditioned fusion improved transfer across planting calendars, and uncertainty calibration reduced false alerts at fixed recall. Discussion: Because the study is based on retrospective datasets, these findings establish cross-region retrospective performance rather than prospective field efficacy. The results support further field-based evaluation of multimodal foundation models for climate-resilient crop monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.