Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42577095›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2026

A multimodal geospatial foundation model anticipates crop stress and yield failure across climates and species.

Saleh Albahli, Muhammad Shiraz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Saleh AlbahliDepartment of Information Technology, College of Computer, Qassim University, Buraydah, Saudi Arabia.
Muhammad ShirazDepartment of Computer Science, Federal Urdu University of Arts, Science and Technology, Islamabad, Pakistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Climate extremes increasingly threaten agricultural production, yet many artificial intelligence systems in agriculture remain local, reactive and narrowly trained for one crop, region or sensing modality. Methods: We present AgriFM, a multimodal geospatial foundation model that combines satellite image time series, radar, thermal observations, weather trajectories, soil properties, topography and sparse management variables to estimate crop-stress and yield-failure risk across crops and regions. AgriFM was pretrained using self-supervised objectives on 2.4 million field-season sequences and evaluated on a curated benchmark spanning maize, wheat, soybean, rice and sorghum across five agroclimatic regions. Results: In held-out geography and time-split evaluations, AgriFM improved early stress detection and yield-failure prediction over statistical, crop-model and deep-learning baselines. The largest gains occurred during compound drought and heat events, for which AgriFM produced alerts 18 to 24 days earlier than the satellite-only baseline while maintaining improved calibration. Phenology-conditioned fusion improved transfer across planting calendars, and uncertainty calibration reduced false alerts at fixed recall. Discussion: Because the study is based on retrospective datasets, these findings establish cross-region retrospective performance rather than prospective field efficacy. The results support further field-based evaluation of multimodal foundation models for climate-resilient crop monitoring.

Indexed as

agricultureartificial intelligenceclimate extremescrop stressmultimodal foundation model

Identifiers

PMID42577095
PMCPMC13453674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.