ArticleVideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy2026
Technical considerations for endoscopic submucosal dissection of a large rectal laterally spreading tumor.
Article in VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is an established technique for the management of large colorectal lesions, offering high en bloc and R0 resection rates. Although traction-assisted and tunneling ESD techniques are individually established, each may have limitations in achieving dissection efficiency. We describe important technical considerations in managing large rectal lesions using a combination of both techniques. Methods: A 42-year-old man with mucous stools was found to have a 12-cm rectal laterally spreading tumor, granular type with a dominant nodule. Careful lesion assessment excluded deep submucosal invasion. ESD was performed using both techniques. Results: Initial oral and anal incisions were performed, followed by tunneling dissection. Because of the limited submucosal plane, 2 sequential tractions were applied to enhance exposure. The procedure was completed with en bloc resection, without deep mural injury, and the specimen was successfully retrieved manually to avoid fragmentation. The specimen measured 12 cm, and final pathology showed tubulovillous adenoma, with high-grade dysplasia and R0 resection. Conclusions: The use of tunneling and traction-assisted ESD aids in maintaining an optimal dissection plane and minimizing deep mural injury. Strategic traction placement and gravity-assisted patient positioning are critical for procedural efficiency. Finally, manual specimen extraction can be considered to preserve specimen integrity.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.