ArticlePhotoacoustics2026
Article in Photoacoustics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Complete blood counts are central to clinical practice but require invasive sampling and centralized laboratory analysis. Optical-resolution photoacoustic microscopy provides intrinsic specificity to red blood cells (RBCs) through hemoglobin absorption. However, conventional implementations typically depend on bulky acoustic coupling schemes that hinder clinical translation. Here, we present a compact and integrable, label-free optoacoustic platform that combines optical-resolution excitation in an epi-illumination geometry with a transparent silicon-photonics acoustic detector (SPADE) featuring a wide acoustic acceptance angle that enables detection without strict optical-acoustic co-alignment. System performance was first characterized using optoacoustic point sources and subsequently evaluated in controlled RBC flow experiments within a tapered glass-capillary microfluidic phantom, as well as
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.