ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2026
Daily versus alternate-day oral iron in women with iron deficiency anemia: impact of dosing schedule and adherence on hemoglobin recovery.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is common among women of reproductive age and is frequently associated with abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB). Although oral iron is first-line therapy, the optimal dosing schedule remains uncertain. This study compared daily and alternate-day oral iron in real-world practice. Materials and methods: We conducted a prospective observational cohort study of women aged 18-70 years with confirmed IDA treated with oral ferrous sulfate at a tertiary referral center between January 2023 and June 2024. Patients received oral iron every 24 h or every 48 h according to physician prescription. AUB etiology was classified using the PALM-COEIN system. Outcomes included hemoglobin change, World Health Organization anemia severity, hemoglobin normalization (≥12 g/dL), adherence, adverse-event-related discontinuation, and intravenous iron escalation. Results: A total of 171 women were included. Leiomyomas were the most frequent PALM-COEIN category (106 patients, 62.0%). Mean baseline hemoglobin was 9.02 ± 1.45 g/dL. At 6 weeks, mean hemoglobin was 10.91 ± 1.76 g/dL in the 24-h group and 11.26 ± 1.86 g/dL in the 48-h group ( Conclusion: Both regimens were associated with hematologic improvement. However, because allocation was non-randomized, baseline differences were present, and intravenous iron escalation was not based on standardized criteria, equivalence cannot be inferred. Oral iron dosing should be individualized.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.