ArticleBrain & spine2026
Longitudinal volume evolution of large and giant intracranial aneurysms following endovascular flow diversion.
Article in Brain & spine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Large and giant intracranial aneurysms (IAs) pose significant therapeutic challenges due to their complex morphology and high rupture risk. Flow diverters (FD) promote intrasaccular thrombosis, facilitating occlusion. However, the temporal volumetric evolution of FD-treated large and giant IAs remains variable and poorly understood. Here, we sought to assess the temporal volumetric evolution of large and giant aneurysms treated with FD. Methods: Retrospective single-center study (2018-2022) of aneurysms ≥15 mm treated with FD, with late MRI follow-up. Demographic, morphological and radiological variables (total/patent volumes on T2, TOF hyperintensity, FLAIR edema, T1 contrast enhancement) were collected and analyzed together with complications and occlusion status. Results: Twenty-four patients (median age 64 years, 54% female) were analyzed (saccular 75%, unruptured 96%, anterior circulation 88%). Median follow-up was 41.3 months by MRI and 24.7 months by angiography. Mortality was 17% (4/24), including three fatal post-treatment aneurysm ruptures. After FD treatment, total aneurysm volume did not significantly decrease (-0.86 cm Conclusions: In large and giant aneurysms treated with FDs, despite high occlusion rates and decreased patent volumes, aneurysm total volume is not similarly reduced. This suggests that the effect of flow diversion is driven mainly by intrasaccular flow cessation and occlusion rather than by measurable volume reduction. Larger studies are needed to confirm our findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.