ArticleMethodsX2026
A Systemic embolization model in a rat with real-time micro-fluoroscopy for direct quantification of thrombolysis.
Article in MethodsX, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recanalization after intravenous thrombolysis remains incomplete in many stroke patients, highlighting the need for standardized preclinical methods to evaluate thrombolytic therapies. We developed a rat systemic embolization model combined with high-resolution micro-fluoroscopy enabling direct, real-time, and quantitative assessment of thrombolysis in vivo. Human fibrin-based BaSO₄ labeled clots were introduced into the abdominal aorta (three clots/animal) to assess alteplase (rtPA) efficacy at doses of 0.9 and 5 mg/kg/h. Micro-CT imaging served as a reference modality. Micro-fluoroscopy continuously visualized clot dissolution, detecting a mean of two clots per animal. Thrombolysis resulted in a dose-dependent reduction in clot area (mean ± SD; -46 ± 26% and -81 ± 22% for 0.9 and 5 mg/kg/h rtPA, respectively, versus -21 ± 14% in controls). Measurement reliability was high (ICC = 0.89), and concordance with micro-CT supported concurrent validity. The model demonstrated predictive and construct validity, and offers technically feasible, reproducible, and standardized platform for pharmacodynamic evaluation of thrombolytic agents.•A systemic embolization model with C-arm micro-fluoroscopy enables direct, real-time visualization of thrombolysis in vivo.•Applying multiple clots per animal reduces the total number of animals required.•The model allows standardized, reproducible testing of thrombolytics with translational relevance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.